Higher Returns for Less Risk? A 60/40 Backtest

Adaptive’s powerful Backtest tool enables advisors to show clients how hedging would have performed in the past for a particular portfolio. In this example, a ‘plain vanilla’ 60/40 portfolio is compared to a stock portfolio which is hedged with index puts over the five years from mid-2019 to mid-2024. The remarkable results ? The hedged portfolio (‘Buy & Hold 2.0’ dotted red line) outperformed not only the risk-equivalent 60/40 portfolio (‘60/40’ solid red line)—it even outperformed the much riskier all-stock portfolio (‘S&P 500’ grey area):

A few key points about the Backtest & this chart:

  • Buy & Hold 2.0: Pay-outs Can More Than Cover the Cost of Protection. One would expect the cost of hedging to be a drag on performance; it is a drag, in general. Nevertheless the two pay-outs in this particular Backtest scenario happily more than cover the cost of five years of hedging with index puts. You can see these pay-outs in the two dotted orange vertical lines. The value of the pay-outs are further compounded by reinvestment in the hedged portfolio.

  • Rebalance 2.0: Pay-outs Help Rebalance & Buy Lower. Much like classic portfolio rebalancing, Buy & Hold 2.0 assumes that pay-outs are reinvested in the portfolio, helping make use of stock market corrections to buy at lower prices. The Adaptive Backtest includes a table of the compounded cost and benefit of all hedges to help compare the hedged portfolio to its 60/40 risk-equivalent & the unhedged portfolio. To further help with direct comparisons, the 60/40 risk-equivalent portfolio is rebalanced quarterly for a consistent asset allocation, effectively selling high & buying low as stocks & bonds follow their own paths.

  • Risk-Equivalent Downside Protection. The level of put protection can be calibrated to ‘buy down’ the risk of a portfolio to the downside risk-equivalent of a less risky portfolio. In this Backtest scenario we have created a 60/40 risk-equivalent. It could easily be a downside risk-equivalent to an 80/20 portfolio (more aggressive, less hedging) or even a 20/80 portfolio (less aggressive, more hedging). Adaptive streamlines this process by calculating the risk-equivalent protection level & protection periods. We’ll have more about this in another post.

  • Portfolio Hedging with Index Matching. This Backtest assumes a plain vanilla portfolio but show any stock portfolios to the Adaptive software (no owner names needed), & it will look for a suitable, tax-smart index fit (S&P 500, Nasdaq 100, Russell 2000) to consider as an efficient hedge instead of (1) put buying on individual positions or (2) selling & thus missing out on the possibility of equity growth. Even concentrated tech portfolios such as the Magnificent Seven can often benefit from index hedging. See for yourself with your own portfolios and a free 30-day trial.

Philip Sun, a former portfolio manager, is co-founder and CEO of Adaptive Investment Solutions. He also teaches finance and data analytics at Boston University and Hult International Business School. An amateur violinist, Philip is a devotee of Bach and gypsy jazz. In the early mornings, you can find Philip training for sprint triathlons in the western suburbs of Boston. Contact Philip via LinkedIn and follow Adaptive on Twitter.

Playing Defense

TRUTH HAS A FUNNY way of punching you in the gut. I received my punch thanks to the 2022 decline in the stock market, which put a dent in the “funded” status of the 529 college-savings plans for my two sons, ages 16 and 14.

Buy and hold is all well and good if you have an infinite investment time horizon. Strict adherents will argue that mark-to-market gains and losses are just noise. Time will smooth out the ripples. But what if the funds are earmarked for an upcoming goal, like college costs or retirement?

Already, parents in my shoes are aghast at nearly $80,000 a year for tuition, room and board at private colleges in the Boston area. A 20% drop in a fully funded 529 plan with, say, a $320,000 balance means a $64,000 loss. My sons, of course, may go to one of the excellent public universities here in Massachusetts, where tuition is lower. But I want them to have a choice.

Responsible investors manage risk. Target-date funds, available in some 529 college-savings plans and most retirement plans, achieve this with a “glide path.” These funds automatically shift a portfolio’s asset allocation away from stocks as the target date approaches, reducing the prospects not only of stock-like losses, but also stock-like gains. As a prudent financial advisor would counsel, don’t risk what you can’t afford to lose.

Well, here’s another truism: There’s no return without taking risk. I still feel like I need investment growth. Instead of getting out of the stock market, I’m staying fully invested, while managing risk with my own homegrown downside protection.

The 529 plans for my sons remain invested in stocks. But at the same time, I’m spending some of the money that would otherwise have gone into their accounts to buy put options. Those put options pay off if the S&P 500 plunges in value. What if, instead, the S&P 500 rises? The options will expire worthless.

To be sure, the cost of hedging is a drag on performance. But I think of the option premiums I pay as similar to insurance premiums. Yes, I’m giving up some of the gains in a rising stock market. But in return, I have the peace of mind that the options will keep my boys’ college funds intact when the market declines. Sometimes the best offense is a good defense.


Philip Sun, a former portfolio manager, is co-founder and CEO of Adaptive Investment Solutions, LLC, a provider of one-click portfolio downside protection solutions. He also teaches finance and data analytics at Boston University and Hult International Business School. An amateur violinist, Philip is a devotee of Bach and gypsy jazz. In the early mornings, you can find Philip training for sprint triathlons in the western suburbs of Boston. Contact Philip via LinkedIn and follow him on Twitter @Adaptive_Invest.